Teh Bee V Maruthamuthu

Maruthamuthu 1977 2 mlj 7 trial magistrate high court ajaib singh j federal court ali ag cj malaya raja azlan shah wan suleiman fjj outline.

Teh bee v maruthamuthu. Teh bee v k maruthamuthu there is no obligation on the part of the authorities to grant a renewal of a tol for any subsequent year. Teh bee v k maruthamuthu case where the federal court stated that under the torrens system the register is everything and it would be wrong to allow an investigation as to the right of the person to appear upon the register when he holds the certificate of title equitable relief. 238 73 filed in the magistrate s court at seremban the appellant teh bee f claimed from the respondent k. But she pay the sum 8 months after the stipulated date.

Land law i law 504 academic year. The claim was based on trespass. Ali ag cj malaya in civil action no. The respondent could have applied to renew the tol but she had not done so it for one of two reasons either because the tol.

Maruthamuthu vacant possession of a piece of land of which she was at all material times the registered proprietor or proprietress. She supposedly pay the sum 3 months from the date mentioned in form 5a with was in nov 16 1966. In the federal court the following judgment was delivered. Teh bee v k maruthamuthu 1977 2 mlj 7.

The bee v maruthamuthu the bee tb an applicant of land under alienation made payment of land revenue beyond specified time.